Case 1803666/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Husain v Excel Parking Services Limited AT A HEARING — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803666/2022
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Husain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Husain did not attend the hearing, but the tribunal proceeded in his absence. The respondent said his salary was normally paid monthly in arrears, and that it had suspended him on 6 July 2022 pending an investigation into alleged falsification of time sheets and possible overpayment. The tribunal held that, under the contract and handbook, the respondent was entitled to delay payment of the June salary while the amount properly payable was disputed, so that no sum was yet properly payable by 10 July 2022.
The tribunal then reviewed the final salary deductions one by one. It accepted as authorised the deduction of £995.13 for 104.75 hours found not to have been worked, the May reconciliation of £142.50, the private mileage deductions of £110.00 and £159.60, the invoiced valeting costs of £15.00 and motoring charges of £105.00, the holiday deduction of £197.60, and the attachment of earnings deduction of £40.07 under section 14(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It held that the £200 July mileage deduction was not authorised because it was discretionary under the policy and there was no signed approval or good reason/firm evidence of an actual debt or loss, and that three administration charges of £30.00 each were also unauthorised for the same reason.
On that basis, the tribunal found that a total of £290.00 had been deducted without proper authorisation, leaving £174.10 outstanding. It therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £174.10.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded only to the extent of the net unpaid balance. The tribunal held that several deductions were authorised by the contract/handbook or statute, but £290 had been deducted without proper authorisation, leaving £174.10 due. | Upheld | — | £174 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £174
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.14(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.