Case 1803669/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Norton v Cutwel Limited HELD by: CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803669/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Norton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe sole purpose of the preliminary hearing on 12 January 2022 was to decide whether the claimant had a disability. The claimant gave evidence, and at the end of that evidence his counsel asked for time to take instructions. After a 20-minute adjournment, counsel returned and said the claimant wished to withdraw his claim for discrimination arising from disability and his application about whether he had a disability.
The tribunal then dismissed the claim. The reasons record that the dismissal followed both the withdrawal and the claimant's failed application that he had a disability within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. No monetary remedy was awarded or discussed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claim for discrimination arising from disability was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. The dismissal followed the claimant's failed application on whether he had a disability within section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.