Case 1803676/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v The Estate of Anthony Edward Burgess T/a The Black Bull Inn and John Burgess — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803676/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked at the first respondent pub. The landlord died on 14 January 2019, which terminated the contracts of employment of his then employees, including the claimant. The claimant started ACAS conciliation in mid-April 2019 and presented her claim on 4 July 2019.
The tribunal held that the holiday pay claim was out of time because it should have been presented within three months of the date on which Regulation 14 holiday pay should have been paid. It also recorded that the redundancy payment claim was in time and that the first respondent consented to judgment in the sum of £2,352.01, calculated on the basis of ten years' service, age 31 at termination, and a pay calculation higher than that in the claim form.
The complaint against John Burgess was dismissed because he had not employed the claimant, and the tribunal said he was properly to be dismissed from the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The complaint against John Burgess was dismissed; the tribunal said he had not employed the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment succeeded against the first respondent, and judgment was entered for £2,352.01. | Upheld | — | £2,352 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of holiday pay on termination was dismissed because it was presented outside the requisite time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,352
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.