Case 1803696/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Khan v The MFG Academies Trust and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803696/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs S Khan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 20 January 2022, Employment Judge Cox found that Mrs S Khan did not meet the definition of a disabled person at the material time. That finding disposed of the disability-based complaints before the tribunal.
The tribunal recorded that the claims of harassment related to disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments both failed and were dismissed. No compensation or other remedy was awarded in this written record of decision.
The written record states that reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days. No further reasoning or legal test is set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Harassment related to disability was dismissed after the tribunal found the claimant did not meet the definition of a disabled person at the material time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed after the tribunal found the claimant did not meet the definition of a disabled person at the material time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.