Case 1803698/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MS MARIA BALAZOVA v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803698/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MS MARIA BALAZOVA
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages. The amount identified in the judgment was £211.58 gross.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim for detriment under s45A(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and written reasons were not requested at that time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the deduction was unauthorised and gives the award as £211.58 gross. | Upheld | — | £212 |
| Other | The judgment describes this as a claim for detriment under s45A(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; no more specific locked claim_type enum applies. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £212
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.