Case 1803712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Gill v City Plumbing Supplies Holdings Ltd, t/a PTS Plumbing Trade Supplies — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803712/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Representation
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Gill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Gill brought an unfair dismissal claim against City Plumbing Supplies Holdings Ltd, t/a PTS Plumbing Trade Supplies. At the hearing before Employment Judge Deeley on 13 November 2019 at North Shields, the tribunal also dealt with an application to amend the claim to add wrongful dismissal. The respondent opposed the amendment, but the tribunal allowed it applying the guidance in Selkent, noting that the original claim already said the claimant had been dismissed without notice and that the proposed wrongful dismissal claim did not require new facts.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim pleaded as breach of contract was allowed by amendment but then dismissed at full hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Selkent
- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.3 Employment Tribunals Act
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.