Case 1803724/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K L Morris v Mr K Dennison HELD by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803724/2021
- Decision date
- 18 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr W Roberts, Mr G Corbett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K L Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 17 to 18 February 2022 before Employment Judge JM Wade, sitting with Mr W Roberts and Mr G Corbett, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s holiday pay complaint and her complaint about failure to provide written reasons for dismissal were dismissed on withdrawal. The claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s Equality Act complaint, recording that a contravention of section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 was made out. The judgment does not set out further factual findings in the extracted text, but it states the successful discrimination claim expressly and records the relief that followed.
The respondent was ordered to pay £8,026 in total, comprising £6,000 for injury to feelings, a £1,500 uplift for an unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS code, and £526 interest. The judgment does not split the award between claims beyond linking the total sum to the successful Equality Act claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint of failure to provide written reasons for dismissal; the judgment does not specify the statutory basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records a contravention of section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £8,026 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,026
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 18 Equality Act 2010
- ACAS code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.