Case 1803738/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Davis v Birchwood Property Development Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803738/2021
- Decision date
- 28 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr L Davis's sex discrimination complaint. On 7 October 2021, the tribunal wrote to the claimant and gave him an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the sex discrimination complaint. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims stayed listed for hearing on 14 to 16 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out the sex discrimination complaint because it had no reasonable prospect of success. By letter dated 7 October 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but he failed to make sufficient representations or to request a hearing. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.