Case 1803789/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B A Ezard v Goose Playspace Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent’s registered office on 15 July and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803789/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe proceedings were posted to the respondent’s registered office on 15 July 2020. The judgment records that there was no response by 12 August 2020 and that there was sufficient information on the file for the tribunal to give judgment under Rule 21.
Mrs B A Ezard’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded, and the tribunal ordered Goose Playspace Limited to pay her the gross sum of £704. Her claim for unpaid holiday on termination also succeeded, with a gross award of £352.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim for notice pay succeeded as well, and the tribunal ordered payment of £89.55 gross. The judgment does not set out any additional findings beyond those awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £704 for unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £704 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £352 for unpaid holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £352 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £89.55 for notice pay on the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | £90 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,146
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.