Case 1803798/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Ferguson v Tuck Inn Café UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803798/2020
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Ferguson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Ferguson worked as a counter assistant at Tuck Inn Café in Doncaster from around 2003 on fixed shifts amounting to 21.5 hours per week. The tribunal found that she was paid in cash, had never been given a written contract, statement of particulars, or payslips, and that the Respondent had failed to submit her pay details to HMRC for a period before February 2020. When the café closed under lockdown, the Claimant understood she would be furloughed, but no written furlough agreement or other written variation to her pay was produced.
The tribunal held that the Claimant was not paid between 23 March 2020 and 26 August 2020. It rejected any suggestion that the Respondent had a statutory entitlement to withhold pay, and found there was no written contractual term or written agreement authorising the deduction. The Claimant's expectation that she would receive 80% under the CJRS did not amount to an agreement, and the tribunal noted that the CJRS issue was a matter between the Respondent and HMRC rather than a justification for not paying wages. The Claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages therefore succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal calculated the unpaid wages at £4,158.14, broken down by week and by the National Minimum/National Living Wage rates applicable during the period. It then made a separate uplift under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the Respondent had failed to provide written initial particulars of employment. The tribunal found there were no circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable and uplifted the award by the higher amount of 4 weeks' pay, assessed at £749.92, producing a total award of £4,908.06.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Claimant had not been paid from 23 March 2020 to 26 August 2020 and that there was no statutory or contractual basis for withholding wages. A separate section 38 Employment Act 2002 uplift of four weeks' pay was also awarded because the Respondent had failed to provide written particulars. | Upheld | — | £4,158 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,908
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,158
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.