Case 1803803/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Long v Humberport Logistics — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803803/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Long
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 June 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because he had not complied with the tribunal order dated 4 May 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide any written explanation and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal found that the order had not been complied with and that the claim was not being actively pursued. On that basis, Employment Judge Davies struck out the claim on 7 July 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the reasons, but the case listing records unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the order dated 4 May 2021 and did not actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the reasons, but the case listing records unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the order dated 4 May 2021 and did not actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.