Case 1803805/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Shann v Playtopia Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803805/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Shann
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Playtopia Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £149.35 gross/net. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £936.75 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £306. On the separate complaint about itemised pay slips, the tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to provide them since November 2019, save for January 2020. However, it did not yet make an award on that complaint because it required further information about the claimant's calculation of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £149 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal was found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £937 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £306 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay slips since November 2019, save for January 2020, but made no award because it required further information on the claimant's calculation of compensation for this complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.