Case 1803847/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend v Mellors Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803847/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Reed worked for Mellors Catering Services Limited as a Catering Manager at Rawmarsh Community School. After ACAS early conciliation from 9 to 15 June 2021, she presented a claim on 18 June 2021 alleging that the respondent had not paid the correct amount of holiday pay during furlough leave from March to September 2020. The matter came before Employment Judge Cox at a preliminary hearing on 21 February 2022. Neither party attended, and the respondent relied on written representations only.
The tribunal first considered the time limits. It assumed in the claimant's favour that the claim could be treated as a series of unauthorised deductions from wages and that the final alleged underpayment was received at the end of September 2020. On that basis, the three-month limitation period expired at the end of December 2020. Because the claimant did not contact ACAS until 18 June 2021, the early conciliation extension did not assist her claim.
The claimant said she only pursued the matter after a former colleague raised the issue in September 2020 and again on 11 May 2021, after which she queried holiday pay with managers. The tribunal found that she could reasonably have been expected to take steps to check and enforce her rights when she first became aware of the alleged underpayment by the end of September 2020. It held that the respondent's assurances did not make it not reasonably practicable for her to present the claim in time.
The tribunal further held that, even if time only became problematic once the claimant spoke to colleagues on 11 and 12 May 2021, she did not present the claim within a further reasonable period because she waited about five weeks. The claim was therefore dismissed as presented out of time, and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Preliminary hearing only. The claimant alleged underpaid holiday pay during furlough leave from March to September 2020. The tribunal dismissed the claim as presented out of time, while assuming in the claimant's favour for limitation purposes that it could be treated as a series of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
- Regulation 30(2)(a) WTR 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(b) WTR 1998
- Section 23(3) ERA 1996
- Section 23(4) ERA 1996
- Section 207B ERA 1996
- Regulation 30B WTR 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.