Case 1803848/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v A Marketing Vocation Ltd (in Administration) (“AMVOC”) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade (as an Interested Party) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1803848/2023
- Decision date
- 20 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal declared that the claims of the remaining claimants, who worked in the respondent's Leeds office and were listed in the attached schedule, were well-founded. The claims were that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of s188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The Tribunal made a protective award of 90 days' pay for the claimants who were dismissed as redundant, with the protected period beginning on 2 September 2020. The judgment states that there was no contested hearing because the respondent had neither entered a response nor attended the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment declares the remaining claimants' claims under s188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well-founded and makes a protective award of 90 days' pay. No monetary amount is stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.