Case 1803849/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mr N Ahmed v The Vedas Todmorden Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1803849/2020
Decision date: 29 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Maidment

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr N Ahmed

Respondent

The Vedas Todmorden Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This judgment is procedural only. By a letter dated 02 March 2021, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out.

The Tribunal recorded that this was the second Preliminary Hearing the respondent had failed to attend. It also noted that the reason given for non-attendance was wholly unsatisfactory and showed no regard for the priority that should be given to court proceedings. The hearing was a telephone hearing, and the respondent did not even notify the Tribunal that he could not attend.

On that basis, the Tribunal ordered that the response be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims, and it does not contain any remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify or determine any substantive claim. It records only that the respondent's response was struck out after a further opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, and does not state the underlying claim outcomes.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.