Case 1803863/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Palmer v Loop Telecommunications Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803863/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Rostant Date found that Loop Telecommunications Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Palmer’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £1,803.84 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the claimant’s contract and ordered payment of a further net sum of £595.64. The extracted judgment records the orders only and does not set out any additional reasoning, hearing details, or panel members.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,803.84. | Upheld | — | £1,804 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the respondent had breached the claimant’s contract and ordered payment of the net sum of £595.64. | Upheld | — | £596 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,399
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.