Case 1803863/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Chester v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803863/2021
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms D Chester
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaints against the second respondent, Nevison Pharmacy Limited. It had given the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 30 July 2021, to make representations or request a hearing on why those complaints should not be struck out because she had already brought claims against the second respondent and received judgment dated 19 February 2020.
The Tribunal found the claimant's representations were without merit. It stated that the claim before the Tribunal was against the Secretary of State only under section 188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that there was no rule or basis for presenting the claim against the second respondent. The claim against the first respondent remained listed for hearing on 24 September 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaints against the second respondent were struck out. The judgment states the claimant's claim before the Tribunal is against the Secretary of State only under section 188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that the claim against the first respondent remained listed for hearing on 24 September 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.