Case 1803869/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Knill (solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803869/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- By telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone on 23 September 2020 before Employment Judge Davies. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Knill, solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claims of sex discrimination and marriage discrimination, together with the claim for notice pay, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No merits findings were made on those claims in this judgment.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claims were to continue in accordance with the case management orders made at the hearing. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Other | The judgment refers only to a 'claim for notice pay' and does not identify the underlying legal category in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.