Case 1803889/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Mahmood v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council TELEPHONE PRIVATE PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803889/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Mahmood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone private preliminary hearing on 28 September 2020, Employment Judge S Shore recorded that the claimant, Mr Y Mahmood, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Counsel. The judgment disposed only of the pleaded claims, and no merits findings were made.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's sex discrimination claim and his claim for 'other payments' were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any factual findings on the substance of either claim, and it records no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at a telephone private preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to a claim for 'other payments' and states that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.