Case 1803908/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Franks v Gleeson Developments Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard: BY CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803908/2021
- Decision date
- 3 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Franks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 28 October 2021, Employment Judge JM Wade dealt with the claimant's complaints about unlawful deductions from wages. The judge granted permission for the respondent to present a response to the claimant’s complaint about commission while on furlough, but did not grant an extension of time for a response to the unlawful deduction of company sick pay complaint.
The tribunal said there was sufficient information before it to give judgment on the company sick pay issue and entered a Rule 21 judgment. That complaint succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,050.
The remaining claim, described as the unlawful deduction from wages complaint about commission while on furlough, was not determined at this hearing and was listed for a further hearing on 17 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction of company sick pay succeeds and the respondent shall pay the gross sum of £4,050. | Upheld | — | £4,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.