In person For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 1803921/2021
Decision date: 26 November 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge O’Neill Appearance
Venue: Leeds in private

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing heard by telephone in Leeds on 25 November 2021 before Employment Judge O’Neill. The judgment records that the claims were dismissed because the Claimant withdrew them. The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims.

By consent, the respondent’s name was amended to Farmers Boy Ltd. The tribunal also ordered that no costs be made against the Claimant, noting that he was a litigant in person and had acted reasonably.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing/category, as the judgment text itself does not specify the substantive claims.	Withdrawn	Race	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing/category, as the judgment text itself does not specify the substantive claims.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.