Case 1804035/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hopkins v Healthy Nibbles Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804035/2023
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hopkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 11 July 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 5 September 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in relation to wages and holiday pay. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a gross sum, with the claimant responsible for any tax and national insurance payable. The extracted text renders the amount as £11.068.11, which appears to be £11,068.11.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to wages and holiday pay. The extracted text renders the award as £11.068.11; this appears to mean £11,068.11. | Upheld | — | £11,068 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,068
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.