Case 1804037/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Brand v Peanut Pubs Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804037/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Brand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not appear. The claimant, Ms R Brand, appeared in person and the case was heard by video in Leeds on 5 September 2023 before Employment Judge T Knowles.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,233.56.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £291.76. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £1,525.32.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,233.56 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,234 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £291.76 for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,525
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.