Case 1804042/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C O’Hare v Umbrella Protect and Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804042/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C O’Hare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C O’Hare brought three breach of contract claims against Umbrella Protect and Care Limited: unpaid wages, accrued untaken holiday pay, and notice pay. At the hearing on 26 September 2019 before Employment Judge Buckley, the respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that each of the three breach of contract claims succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,500 gross for unpaid wages, £773.05 gross for accrued untaken holiday pay, and £576.92 gross for notice pay. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the published decision.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims were recorded in the judgment. The total of the sums ordered is £3,849.97 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim for breach of contract in respect of unpaid wages succeeded and ordered payment of £2,500 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim for breach of contract in respect of accrued untaken holiday pay succeeded and ordered payment of £773.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £773 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay succeeded and ordered payment of £576.92 gross. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,850
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.