Case 1804046/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wicks v Umbrella Protect and Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804046/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wicks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 September 2019 at Leeds Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge Buckley determined three breach of contract claims brought by Mr R Wicks against Umbrella Protect and Care Limited. The respondent did not attend; the claimant appeared in person. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,500 gross. It also upheld the claim for accrued untaken holiday pay and ordered payment of £403.83 gross. A further breach of contract claim for notice pay was also upheld, with an award of £576.92 gross.
The judgment does not set out separate legal reasoning beyond the outcome on each head of claim, and it does not allocate the awards between statutory remedy categories. The total monetary award flowing from the three upheld breach of contract claims is £3,480.75 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract (unpaid wages). | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract (accrued untaken holiday pay). | Upheld | — | £404 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,481
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.