Case 1804056/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr C Boylin v Nestle UK Ltd and 1 other — 2019

Case reference: 1804056/2019
Decision date: 18 September 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr C Boylin

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing by telephone conference call, the Tribunal recorded the withdrawal of disability-related claims against the Second Respondent. The claims of indirect discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments against the Second Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal.

The Tribunal also dismissed upon withdrawal the claim that the Claimant was treated unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of disability in the circumstances alleged in paragraph 22(a) of the Claim Form. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The claims of indirect discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments against the Second Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	The claim of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, in the circumstances alleged in paragraph 22(a) of the Claim Form, was dismissed upon withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.