Case 1804057/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person supported by Mr A Parker (husband) For the v Mr P Crowe (solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804057/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Appearance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person supported by Mr A Parker (husband) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 10-11 February 2020, before Employment Judge Rogerson, the tribunal held that Mr I Brown had insufficient qualifying service to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal, so that claim was dismissed. The judgment also records that he was and was a disabled person at the material time, identified as November 2017 to 12 March 2019.
The claimant withdrew complaints of breach of contract, unlawful deductions of wages, breach of working time regulations, trade union detriment and health and safety dismissal. The judgment states that those complaints were accordingly dismissed.
The judgment further records that the remaining complaints identified at the preliminary hearing on 10-11 February 2020 would proceed to a hearing. No monetary award was made in this preliminary judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had insufficient qualifying service to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew this complaint; the judgment records it as accordingly dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant withdrew this complaint; the judgment records it as accordingly dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The complaint was withdrawn and the judgment records it as accordingly dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Trade union | The complaint of trade union detriment was withdrawn and the judgment records it as accordingly dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | This was the complaint of health and safety dismissal; it was withdrawn and the judgment records it as accordingly dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.