Case 1804071/2023 · Employment Tribunal
did not attend v Ms Ajibade, consultant — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804071/2023
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
did not attend
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge JM Wade by CVP on 13 February 2024. The claimant, Mr H Dulak, did not attend. The respondent was represented by Ms Ajibade, consultant. The judgment records complaints against Staffco Direct Limited and Tonyrefail Limited.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaint against the first respondent succeeded, and ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £586. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning, findings of fact, or any separate remedy breakdown beyond that amount.
The complaint against the second respondent was dismissed, to the extent that judgment could be declared against the second respondent. No legal test is identified in the extracted judgment text, and no lay members are listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant’s complaint against the first respondent succeeded and the first respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £586. The complaint against the second respondent was dismissed, to the extent judgment could be declared against it. | Upheld | — | £586 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £586
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.