Case 1804082/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mellors Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804082/2021
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a catering assistant and alleged that the respondent had failed to pay the correct holiday pay during a period of furlough leave from March 2020 until the start of the school term in September 2020. The tribunal considered the preliminary issue of whether the claim had been presented within the applicable time limit.
For limitation purposes, the tribunal assumed in the claimant's favour that the claim could be treated as a series of unauthorised deductions from wages, with the final alleged underpayment on 18 September 2020. On that basis, the claim should have been presented by 17 December 2020. The claimant did not contact ACAS until 5 July 2021 and presented the claim on 6 August 2021, so early conciliation did not extend the limitation period.
The tribunal found that the claimant believed in September 2020 that she had been underpaid, could reasonably have sought advice from her union or ACAS at that time, and had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It also found that, even if time had been capable of extension, the later delay until August 2021 was not within a further reasonable period. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal dismissed the holiday pay claim at a preliminary hearing because it was presented out of time. The judgment considered the time limit both as a Working Time Regulations holiday pay claim and as a possible unauthorised deduction from wages claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(2)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30B Working Time Regulations 1998
- Section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.