Case 1804090/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hillyard v Turning Point — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804090/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hillyard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract in respect of notice pay. Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 2 August 2019, and no response was presented.
The tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The judgment states that the unfair dismissal and breach of contract notice pay claims succeed, with remedy to be determined at a remedy hearing listed for 20 November 2019.
The reasons section contains an unclear reference to “unfair dismissal disability discrimination” succeeding, but the pleaded claims and operative judgment identify unfair dismissal and breach of contract notice pay only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment states the unfair dismissal claim succeeds; remedy to be determined at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim identified as breach of contract - notice pay; Rule 21 judgment states it succeeds, with remedy to be determined at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.