Case 1804105/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804105/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of 1730.77. It also found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay over pension contributions to the relevant authority and ordered damages of 1921.87.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of this amount. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent breached contract by failing to pay over pension contributions and orders damages in this amount. | Upheld | — | £1,922 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,653
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.