Case 1804120/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Fowler v York Cocoa Works Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804120/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Fowler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms C Fowler, brought claims against York Cocoa Works Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay. Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 2 August 2019, and no response was presented.
Applying Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the employment judge found that, on the information before the tribunal, both the unauthorised deductions from wages claim and the holiday pay claim succeeded. The judgment did not quantify any sums at that stage.
The judgment directed that the preliminary hearing listed for 27 September 2019 be converted into a Remedy Hearing for the successful claims, where the remedy due to the claimant would be determined.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; remedy to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21; remedy to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.