Case 1804121/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Irshad v Jack Hillas & Sons Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1804121/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Irshad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 8 October 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with tribunal orders and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Lancaster ordered that the claim be struck out on 16 October 2025.
The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive causes of action beyond the case listing, and it records no findings on the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 8 October 2025 to make written representations or request a hearing. The stated reasons were non-compliance with tribunal orders and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the underlying claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.