Case 1804134/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S White v Cha Lounge Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804134/2023
- Decision date
- 19 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Hull by video on 19 September 2023, Employment Judge Miller determined the claimant’s claims against Cha Lounge Ltd. The claimant’s claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and for outstanding holiday pay on termination were both dismissed. The judgment also records that the respondent failed to give the claimant a pay statement in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant’s claim of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant’s claim for outstanding holiday pay on termination was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Recorded as the respondent’s failure to give the claimant a pay statement in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment also records un-notified deductions of tax and national insurance amounting to £426.95 and orders payment of £200. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent’s counter-claim for breach of contract was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.8 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.