Case 1804160/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Tierney v The Disability Trust t/a Brainkind Heard at Hull by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804160/2024
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Tierney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed following allegations relating to safeguarding, medication administration, information given to safeguarding, and the respondent's appraisal process. The tribunal found that the initial decision to dismiss fell within the band of reasonable responses, given the nature of the claimant's registered manager role and the safeguarding context.
The tribunal found that the appeal was not conducted fairly because it was predetermined and was not given proper, open-minded consideration. The claimant was therefore deprived of a proper opportunity to have the dismissal overturned, making the overall dismissal unfair.
For the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that the claimant's failure to properly investigate and deal with the medication issue, and alternatively or cumulatively the information given to safeguarding, amounted to repudiatory breach of contract. The respondent was therefore entitled to summarily dismiss the claimant, and that claim was dismissed. Remedy was reserved to a future hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and upheld it. Polkey and contributory conduct were not determined and remedy was left to a future hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was in repudiatory breach of contract and the respondent was entitled to summarily dismiss her, so the breach of contract claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- band of reasonable responses
- Whitbread and Milnes
- Polkey
- contributory conduct
- repudiatory breach of contract
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.