Case 1804167/2022 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance or v Miss L Donnelly, solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804167/2022
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Appearance
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance or
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a private preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Brain on 4 January 2023. By letter dated 11 November 2022, the tribunal directed the claimant to explain in writing why his unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that he did not have the requisite qualifying service.
The claimant was ordered to provide those reasons by 25 November 2022, but he failed to do so. The tribunal therefore struck out the claimant’s unfair dismissal case.
The judgment records that, for the avoidance of doubt, the claimant’s remaining complaints were unaffected by the order. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said the claimant did not have the requisite qualifying service to pursue an unfair dismissal complaint, and struck out the claim after he failed to provide written reasons by 25 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.