Case 1804168/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v ERA Home Security Ltd and Ventrolla — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804168/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mr E Dawson against ERA Home Security Limited and Ventrolla were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. No substantive findings on liability, breach, or remedy are recorded in the text supplied.
The only recorded procedural outcome is dismissal following withdrawal under rule 52. The judgment does not set out any factual findings, legal analysis, or award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states: 'The proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.' No separate substantive determination is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.