Case 1804253/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Bradley v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1804253/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties were given notice on 25 May 2023 that the Claim stood dismissed because the Claimant had not complied with an unless order made on 19 May 2023.
The preliminary hearing was convened to consider the Claimant's application to set aside that unless order under rule 39(2) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Claimant did not attend, was not represented, did not inform the Tribunal she would not attend, and gave no explanation for her absence.
After making such enquiries as were practicable about the reasons for the Claimant's absence, the Tribunal dismissed the application to set aside the unless order. The Claim therefore remained dismissed in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claims. It records that the Claim stood dismissed for non-compliance with an unless order and that the Claimant's application to set aside the unless order was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(2) of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.