Case 1804261/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Craddock (husband) v Mrs Jackson (Manager) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804261/2021
- Decision date
- 26 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Craddock (husband)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public hearing by CVP on 26 October 2021, before Employment Judge JM Wade, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Ireland Wood Children's Centre. The judgment records that the complaint was dismissed insofar as it related to an alleged deduction before 24 August 2019, pursuant to section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint succeeded in respect of rolled up holiday pay in each month of employment from September 2019 to 3 May 2021. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £6,001 for that successful part of the claim.
The judgment also states that other alleged unlawful deductions from the claimant's final salary payment were dismissed because they were not pursued or were otherwise not proven.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was dismissed insofar as the alleged deduction was before 24 August 2019 pursuant to section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim succeeded for rolled up holiday pay in each month of employment from September 2019 to 3 May 2021. Other alleged unlawful deductions from the final salary payment were dismissed as not pursued or otherwise not proven. | Upheld | — | £6,001 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,001
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 23(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.