Case 1804261/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Spencer v North Sea Ventilation Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804261/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Spencer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Spencer, brought a claim against North Sea Ventilation Ltd (In Administration). The judgment records that on 27 February 2023 the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Rogerson ordered that the claim be struck out in the judgment dated 4 April 2023. No remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 27 February 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.