Case 1804262/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Abdulrahim v Excel Parking Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804262/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdoch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Abdulrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered two complaints of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 arising from the period 1 June to 10 July 2021. The first concerned monies deducted for damage to a vehicle. That complaint was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The second concerned monies deducted for failure to work out the notice period. That complaint was found well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £805, described as £2,305 gross pay owed minus £1,500 lawfully deducted for vehicle damage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The deduction complaint for vehicle damage was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The deduction complaint for failure to work out the notice period was well-founded; the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £805, calculated as £2,305 gross pay owed less £1,500 lawfully deducted for vehicle damage. | Upheld | — | £805 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £805
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.