Case 1804264/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hagan-Cherry v Uber Britannia Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804264/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hagan-Cherry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Leeds on 8 November 2021 before Employment Judge Knowles, the tribunal dealt only with the claimant's breach of contract claims. It struck those claims out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure on the basis that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them and that they therefore had no reasonable prospect of success.
The written judgment records that the claimant's discrimination claim was not affected by this decision and could proceed separately. No substantive findings were made on the discrimination claim in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded because the breach of contract claims were removed from the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claimant's breach of contract claims under Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no jurisdiction to hear them and they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.