Case 1804266/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Jaszczuk v Hungry Hideout Ltd Heard — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804266/2023
- Decision date
- 21 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Jaszczuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 8 July 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the hearing on 21 September 2023 proceeded under Rule 21 before Employment Judge Shepherd. The claimant attended in person with the assistance of an interpreter, and there was no appearance for the respondent.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and awarded £280 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded a further £280 gross. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars and ordered £560 gross.
The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed because the claimant did not have the required two years' service. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £1,190 in total, although the three individual awards listed in the reasons add to £1,120 and the text does not explain the difference.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £280 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £280 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a written statement of employment particulars and ordered £560 gross. The judgment’s listed awards do not reconcile exactly with the final total of £1,190, and the text does not explain the difference. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the required two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,190
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.