Case 1804276/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Wilson v Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc Heard: Remotely (by video link) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804276/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Non-Legal
- Panel members
- Mrs S Robinson, Mr R Stead
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with discrimination and victimisation allegations together. It found that any acts or omissions before 9 March 2020 were presented outside the three months less one day time limit under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, and it did not consider it just and equitable to extend time.
The tribunal also found that the alleged discriminatory or victimising acts after 9 March 2020 were not unlawful under the Equality Act 2010. The extracted reasons do not identify a protected characteristic, so the discrimination claim is recorded here in general terms.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed. The tribunal found that she was dismissed for the sole reason of redundancy and therefore the claim was not well-founded. The judgment was on liability only and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to discrimination claims generally. Acts or omissions before 9 March 2020 were out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal did not consider it just and equitable to extend time; alleged acts after 9 March 2020 were found not unlawful. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Claims of victimisation before 9 March 2020 were out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal did not consider it just and equitable to extend time; alleged acts after 9 March 2020 were found not unlawful. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed for the sole reason of redundancy and held the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.