Case 1804277/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gieros v Restaurant & Grill Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804277/2019
- Decision date
- 10 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gieros
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds on 10 October 2019, before Employment Judge Shepherd, upheld Mr S Gieros's claim of unauthorised deduction. It ordered Restaurant & Grill Ltd to pay £873.65 gross, with the judgment stating that the claimant was responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for outstanding holiday pay as not well founded. It also dismissed the claim that the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment is brief and records the outcomes without setting out further reasoning. No separate remedy breakdown was given beyond the single gross award for the unauthorised deduction claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Described in the judgment as an 'unauthorised deduction' claim; the tribunal ordered payment of £873.65 gross. | Upheld | — | £874 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for outstanding holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide written particulars of employment pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £874
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.