Case 1804279/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Hackney v Terence Donohoe — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804279/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Hackney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Maidment recorded three successful claims by Mr R Hackney against Terence Donohoe. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,381.10.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £382.50. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,404. The extracted judgment does not record any further reasoning, legal analysis, or separate remedy breakdown beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,381 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards damages for notice pay after finding the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £383 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,168
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.