Case 1804300/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Greaves Respondent 1: The Unity Centre Ltd Respondent 2: Mr A Bevis v Mr Gilbert (consultant) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804300/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Greaves Respondent 1: The Unity Centre Ltd Respondent 2: Mr A Bevis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Sheffield in private on 4 February 2020, before Employment Judge Rostant sitting alone, the claimant withdrew the claims recorded in the judgment as post termination detriment and unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal dismissed those claims upon withdrawal. No merits findings were made on liability for either claim.
The judgment is a short disposal judgment only and records no monetary award or other remedy. It does not set out any substantive findings beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes these as 'post termination detriment' claims; they were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The whistleblowing classification follows the case listing's public interest disclosure category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.