Case 1804303/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Kalinowski v Sam Hunter and and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804303/2019
- Decision date
- 10 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Kalinowski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kalinowski brought a wages claim against Sam Hunter and Christine Barber trading as Hunter Concrete Products. The respondents did not present a response. The tribunal accepted that the claimant was employed personally by Mr Hunter and Ms Barber rather than by Hunter Concrete Products Ltd, because Mr Hunter interviewed him and offered him the job, he was paid directly by Hunter Concrete Products, and the payslips later produced were incorrect and did not name any employer. The tribunal also recorded that he had not been given a written contract of employment.
The tribunal held that the respondents made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay £70 overtime from the week commencing 3 June 2019 and four days' wages from the week commencing 10 June 2019. The claimant said his employment ended when he refused to drive an unsafe vehicle on 13 June 2019 and was told to go home. Ms Barber said the wages were withheld because he had damaged a vehicle, but the tribunal noted there was no signed authority for that and that vehicles were often bumped in the business without employees being told to worry about it. It ordered payment of £470 net.
On the separate issue of the written contract, the tribunal found that at the time proceedings were begun the respondents were in breach of their duty to provide a written contract of employment. It found no exceptional circumstances and said it was not just and equitable to award four weeks' pay, so it awarded two weeks' pay of £1,000. The judgment also states that the claimant indicated he intended to bring an unfair dismissal claim, but that nothing in the judgment dealt with any such claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for £70 overtime from the week commencing 3 June 2019 and four days' wages (£400) from the week commencing 10 June 2019; it ordered payment of £470 net. | Upheld | — | £470 |
| Other | The judgment records a breach of the duty to provide a written contract of employment at the time proceedings were begun. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances and awarded two weeks' pay, rejecting four weeks' pay as not just and equitable. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,470
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.