Case 1804335/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance v White v Manor Estate Social Club 2017 Ltd (in receivership) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804335/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Mr L Priestley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss V White's case against Manor Estate Social Club 2017 Ltd (in receivership) was heard at Sheffield Employment Tribunal on 1 October 2020 before Employment Judge T R Smith, with Mr M Lewis and Mr L Priestley sitting as lay members. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended the hearing. The written judgment records that the claimant's claim under case number 1804335/2019 was dismissed.
The record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days. The written decision therefore does not set out separate findings on the unfair dismissal and race discrimination claims, and it records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed and does not give separate written findings for this claim; reasons were given orally at the hearing. The discrimination claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed and does not give separate written findings for this claim; reasons were given orally at the hearing. The unfair dismissal claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.