Case 1804338/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Parkinson v Anna’s Happy Trotters Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804338/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Parkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short Rule 52 dismissal. It records that the proceedings in case 1804338/2019 were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr T Parkinson, against Anna’s Happy Trotters Limited.
The extracted text does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, and no remedy, liability, or factual issues are decided in the judgment itself. The only recorded procedural outcome is dismissal following withdrawal.
The case listing supplied for this matter identifies breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages as the claim categories, but the judgment text itself does not break the withdrawal down by individual heads of claim or record any separate award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not separate out a distinct determination on this claim type, but the case listing identifies breach of contract as a claim category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not separate out a distinct determination on this claim type, but the case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages as a claim category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.